Bruno Latour’s Second Theory of Cosmopolitics and the Star Trek Cosmogram

Author(s)

  • Eve Seguin Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Laurent-Olivier Lord University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51777/relief17709

Keywords:

politics, science, compositionism, cosmopolitics, cosmogram, imaginary, science fiction, Star Trek

Abstract

In the last 30 years, a body of scholarly works has emerged to account for a new form of politics known as “cosmopolitics”. Bruno Latour is one exponent with his compositionist theory, masterfully developed in Politics of Nature, which defines politics as reality fabrication and emphasises the capture of politics by science since the Greeks. A few years later, Latour decided to revisit his theorisation of cosmopolitics using the notion of cosmograms, a specific type of imaginaries, but in rather idiosyncratic manner. Although still claiming to be studying the politics/science interface, his second theory of cosmopolitics appears to break from compositionism in stripping science from its unique political function, and lacks internal consistency. To illustrate and flesh out this new theory, Latour picks the case of astronomy’s discovery of exoplanets. Unfortunately, when taken in its stringent definition and applied to exoplanets, the notion of cosmogram makes his case crumble. If one chooses to study politics in terms of imaginaries as Latour does in his second theory of cosmopolitics, then science fiction appears to have more political traction than science, as exemplified by the Star Trek cosmogram.

Author Biographies

  • Eve Seguin, Université du Québec à Montréal

    Eve Seguin is professor of political theory, political science, and Science & Technology Studies at Université du Québec à Montréal. Among her research interests are the political organization of modernity, the politics/science interface, liberalism and the rule of law, new materialism, political theories of science and technology, and the thought of Hannah Arendt and Bruno Latour. She is the editor of Infectious Processes. Knowledge, Discourse, and the Politics of Prions, Palgrave Macmillan, and of special issues on Bruno Latour in Perspectives on Science (2023) and Symposium (2018). She has published in journals such as Theory, Culture & Society; Science and Public Policy; Studies in History and Philosophy of Science; or Revue française de science politique.

  • Laurent-Olivier Lord, University of Cambridge

    Laurent-Olivier Lord is MPhil candidate in politics and international studies at the University of Cambridge. Using a historical-genealogical and interpretive approach, his thesis analyses the causes of the political legitimacy that Hungary’s illiberal democracy has been enjoying since 2010. Among his research interests are Russian and Central European politics, theories of democracy, the thought of Bruno Latour, and new materialism. He has published in Réseau québécois d’études post-soviétiques and Perspectives on Science.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-15

How to Cite

“Bruno Latour’s Second Theory of Cosmopolitics and the Star Trek Cosmogram” (2023) RELIEF - REVUE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE LITTÉRATURE FRANÇAISE, 17(1), pp. 110–135. doi:10.51777/relief17709.