Postmodern suspicion in literature: modernity put to the test of protest

Author(s)

  • Abdoulaye Diouf Université Cheikh Anta Diop

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18352/relief.969

Keywords:

narratologie, intermédialité, polyphonie, dialogisme, point de vue, postmodernité

Abstract

Modernity in literature was very early associated by its founding father in France, Baudelaire in particular, with a congenital defect: mistrust of the dogmas constituting its principle − progress and novelty. Starting from the idea that it is less a total break than a criticism, this article considers the postmodernity which appeared in the 80s, as a continuation of this challenge to the regime of the historicity of modernity. Resting on a threefold-dimensional analysis, this paper explores the worldview, the question of the subject and the problem of representation.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Abdoulaye Diouf, Université Cheikh Anta Diop

    Abdoulaye Diouf est enseignant-chercheur à l’Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar. Spécialiste de littérature française moderne et contemporaine, il s’intéresse à la narratologie postclassique et à ses rapports avec l’intermédialité. Son dernier ouvrage, Poétique de la voix narrative dans l’œuvre de Marguerite Yourcenar, est paru en 2013 aux Éditions L’Harmattan en France.

     

    Abdoulaye Diouf is a lecturer and researcher at the Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar, where he teaches the didactics of French as a Foreign Language at the French Language Institute for International Students (IFE) and French literature at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. His latest work, published in 2013 by L’Harmattan in France, focuses on the Poetics of the Narrative Voice in the Work of Marguerite Yourcenar.

     

Downloads

Published

2017-12-20

Issue

Section

I. Modernities Contested

How to Cite

Diouf, A. (2017) “Postmodern suspicion in literature: modernity put to the test of protest”, RELIEF - REVUE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE LITTÉRATURE FRANÇAISE, 11(2), pp. 30–41. doi:10.18352/relief.969.