Sartre, in the year of his centenary: bad master or moral compass?

Author(s)

  • Annie Cohen-Solal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18352/relief.33

Keywords:

Sartre, Kean, Les Mots, La Nausée, Carnets de la drôle de guerre, Le Mur, L'Enfance d'un Chef, La Chambre, L'Etre et le Néant, existentialisme, D.J. van Lennep

Abstract

In France, few people have been so unanimously criticised on the occasion of their centennial as Sartre was in 2005. Apart from Les Temps Modernes and Libération (of which he was the founder), virtually the entire press echoed the same clichés, portraying him as a bad teacher, an old-fashioned thinker or an impostor. The magazine L'Histoire picked up on old, unscientific insinuations about the philosopher's activities during the Nazi occupation. Le Nouvel Observateur continued the salvo, with the catchy headline ‘Faut-il brûler Sartre?’

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles - thematic dossier

How to Cite

Cohen-Solal, A. (2007) “Sartre, in the year of his centenary: bad master or moral compass?”, RELIEF - REVUE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE LITTÉRATURE FRANÇAISE, 1(1), pp. 1–12. doi:10.18352/relief.33.