Middlebrow modernism in film(theory): Visconti’s Senso (1954) vis-à-vis Diamant-Berger’s La madone des sleepings (1955)
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18352/relief.909Mots-clés :
Auteur ‘theory’, adaptations, Rudolf Arnheim, psychology of art, colour filmRésumé
By reflecting upon the travelling concept of the (film) ‘auteur’, the first part of the article argues that Modernism manifests itself differently in cinema studies than in literary studies. Whereas the literary canon is constituted by excluding anything connoting conventional reading matter, a ‘pantheon’ of great directors exhibits a ‘peaceful coexistence’ between popular films and art cinema. The second part of the article addresses the shift in Rudolf Arnheim’s film theory from die-hard Modernist in the 1930s to middlebrow Modernist in the 1950s in a period when Henri Diamant-Berger made an adaptation of Maurice Dekobra’s La madone des sleepings. Concerned with a ‘psychology of art’, Arnheim is to claim a ‘stylized simplicity’ which in the end is better represented by Luchino Visconti’s colourful but nonetheless ‘sophisticated’ melodrama Senso than by Diamant-Berger’s too modest picture. Visconti’s film gives body to the idea of film as a ‘pan-art’, which implies that it is characteristic of cinema to incorporate influences from other art films but also to parasite upon sentimentalism and (high) emotion.Téléchargements
Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.
Téléchargements
Publiée
22-06-2015
Numéro
Rubrique
Articles – dossier thématique
Licence
Tous les articles dans RELIEF sont publiés en libre accès sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Sous ce régime les auteurs conservent les droits d'auteur mais ils consentent à toute sorte d'utilisation de leur texte pourvu qu'il soit correctement cité.
Comment citer
Verstraten, P. (2015) « Middlebrow modernism in film(theory): Visconti’s Senso (1954) vis-à-vis Diamant-Berger’s La madone des sleepings (1955) », RELIEF - REVUE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE LITTÉRATURE FRANÇAISE, 9(1), p. 89–101. doi:10.18352/relief.909.